TRUST & ACCURACY

Airmestra aims to publish clear, accurate and useful information. When we find a meaningful error or an outdated claim that could affect a reader’s understanding or buying decision, we aim to correct it promptly and transparently.

Corrections can include factual errors, incorrect product specifications, broken or misleading comparisons, outdated availability information, calculation mistakes, incorrect links or wording that gives a materially inaccurate impression.

Minor spelling, formatting or style improvements may be fixed without a formal correction note when they do not change the meaning of the content.

Before changing a factual claim, we try to check the strongest available source. For product specifications this normally means manufacturer documentation or another reliable first-party source. For public guidance, we prefer authoritative UK sources where appropriate.

If evidence is unclear or conflicting, we may soften the wording, state the uncertainty or remove the claim rather than guess.

A material correction is one that could reasonably affect a reader’s understanding, recommendation, product comparison or purchasing decision. Examples include a wrong capacity, incorrect operating-cost assumption, misidentified product generation, incorrect retailer offer or a technical statement that changes the conclusion of a guide.

When a page is materially reviewed or corrected, its review or update date may be refreshed so readers can see that the content has been revisited.

Prices, promotions, stock and some product details can change frequently. A price becoming different after publication is not necessarily an editorial error. Where possible, commercial information should carry a “last checked” context and should be rechecked before we make claims such as “cheapest” or “best current price”.

If a product changes generation, capacity, model code or specification, we aim to avoid silently mixing the old and new versions.

Useful corrections often come from readers who spot a specification change, broken link or unclear explanation. If you spot an error, please identify the page, the claim and—where possible—the supporting source when contacting Airmestra. We may independently verify the supporting source before making a factual change.

Affiliate relationships do not prevent us from correcting a product claim, changing a recommendation or removing an offer that is no longer suitable. Accuracy and relevance should take priority over commission.

See our Affiliate Disclosure for more information.

For details on how Airmestra researches products, handles sources, separates research-led coverage from hands-on testing and approaches calculators, see our Editorial & Research Methodology.

Policy version: 1.0
Last reviewed: 14 October 2026